<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Healthy Citizenry is Socialism, the Majority of Us Are Probably Socialists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goldenarple.com/random-musings/if-a-healthy-citizenry-is-socialism-the-majority-of-us-are-probably-socialists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goldenarple.com/random-musings/if-a-healthy-citizenry-is-socialism-the-majority-of-us-are-probably-socialists/</link>
	<description>There are many interesting ideas in this world. This blog is dedicated to pursuing them wherever they go. Politics, philosophy, religion, environment, and anything else that captures imaginations and leads to healthy discussions. Never take the world for what it is, there&#039;s always a better way to do something.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:28:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Golden Arple</title>
		<link>http://www.goldenarple.com/random-musings/if-a-healthy-citizenry-is-socialism-the-majority-of-us-are-probably-socialists/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Golden Arple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldenarple.com/?p=132#comment-24</guid>
		<description>This one maybe not be the only possible solution.. but it&#039;s the only one on that&#039;s being discussed right now. The previous time healthcare was discussed was way back in Clinton&#039;s first years.. almost twenty years ago.  The two parties will never get together to agree on healthcare.. and people will still keep dying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one maybe not be the only possible solution.. but it&#8217;s the only one on that&#8217;s being discussed right now. The previous time healthcare was discussed was way back in Clinton&#8217;s first years.. almost twenty years ago.  The two parties will never get together to agree on healthcare.. and people will still keep dying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unconvinced.</title>
		<link>http://www.goldenarple.com/random-musings/if-a-healthy-citizenry-is-socialism-the-majority-of-us-are-probably-socialists/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Unconvinced.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldenarple.com/?p=132#comment-23</guid>
		<description>People don&#039;t complain about the purchase of missiles because they don&#039;t know it&#039;s happening, or at least to what extent...And most people don&#039;t claim to know a whole fuck of a lot about missiles.

People know about the health of others around them, and they are familiar with &quot;welfare&quot; and other social programs. 

Nobody is arguing AGAINST health. They are arguing that perhaps this one healthcare overhaul may not be the only possible solution. Health care has been a mess for a long time. Why is it so hard to imagine allowing the parties to work together so that a more agreeable plan is reached? Why does this one have to be shoved through like a 10&quot; cock in a virgin&#039;s asshole?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People don&#8217;t complain about the purchase of missiles because they don&#8217;t know it&#8217;s happening, or at least to what extent&#8230;And most people don&#8217;t claim to know a whole fuck of a lot about missiles.</p>
<p>People know about the health of others around them, and they are familiar with &#8220;welfare&#8221; and other social programs. </p>
<p>Nobody is arguing AGAINST health. They are arguing that perhaps this one healthcare overhaul may not be the only possible solution. Health care has been a mess for a long time. Why is it so hard to imagine allowing the parties to work together so that a more agreeable plan is reached? Why does this one have to be shoved through like a 10&#8243; cock in a virgin&#8217;s asshole?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
